๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 412+ reviews
Homeโœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.8 out of 5 (412 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14.49
$24.15
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

The PRAK-T-KAL #900 2 gallon vaporizer, from 1963, with original box and pamphlets. Tested and works. bigbox2

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt delivery

โ†ฉ๏ธ
basic Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier

The PRAK-T-KAL #900 2 gallon vaporizer, from 1963, with original box and pamphlets. Tested and works.

bigbox2

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Home products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1722790

Category: Home > Home Appliances > Humidifiers

Original Price:$24.15 USD

Sale Price: $14.49 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1635 reviews
JA
Joshua Allen
10 months ago ยท Boston, MA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
magnificent Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier!
Good everyday use Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier.
23 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Memphis, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Absolutely magnificent
The Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier is practical and reliable.
27 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker
9 months ago ยท Kansas City, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
solely what I wanted
Feels fine so far.
5 people found this helpful
AC​
Amber Carter โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Minneapolis, MN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
To be fair, the Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier fits my needs so Iโ€™m okay with it.​
28 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Baltimore, MD
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fabulous find!
At first, the Vintage Vaporizer/Humidifier is hassle-complimentary to use which feels reasonable. Works fine so far.
26 people found this helpful